The discipline of agriculture is one that is seeded in nutrition, and the principles of nutrition come from the concept of communal need. Whatever the community would need would be given from its gathering practices of support wherein the capacities that evolved from sedentary living came to be the pillars of structural integrity that shaped worldly living. From this delineation, the fundamental philosophy of agriculture and nutrition develops as a precept to generally based humanism wherein the entirety of society's developmental prose moves in step with how the pathologies of structure define human thought. Nutrition, by natural principle, comes first in the evolutionary biology of human history, and with time, there came agriculture from developmental sedentary living. Humanity is built on both of these principled constructions, and from their housed framing, there comes the methodological narrative of how it is that life comes about from the story embedded in human history. Beginning with either fundamentalism or philosophy, the two terms compose a dichotomous linearity to all of that which would be sensibly situated in the discussions of patterned modularity inevitably granting of full manifold humanist contextualization and configuration. Starting with philosophy, nutrition and agriculture go from the position of "what needs to be eaten?" to "what needs to be made?". Starting from fundamentalism, time and space become integral elements of implication wherein the positions of "what is available?", "what can be found?", and "what can be done?" all find placing within the aforewritten concept. As an arrayed fielding of intercombinative inquiry, the associative arrangement that builds from the above gives a windowed genesis into all of that which is written within the title of this passage, and as the whole of its scribe forms to philosophies of liken dynamic, the analogous dimensions of holistic developmental fundamentalism grow in kind.
No comments:
Post a Comment