The Philosophy of Theft

Theft is defined as wrongfully taking something that does not belong to the person who takes it. Dubbed as criminal because of the passing that is produced when it occurs, the act of wrongfully taking surfaces within this dynamic as the base communicative articulation of how it is that the passing produced by theft is to be interpreted. Taking something that does not belong to one's person is harmful because it can result in their person not having what they need. Within this dynamic, it is not so much that something was taken wrongfully or incorrectly, it is that the person, or entity, who had something taken from them was not asked in the correct way how it is that they would give what was needed. When the event occurs, a space can potentially manifest that generates an inconsistency or issue which is conducive to further harm, so it must always be considered as an event of passing. Fundamentalism, then, unseats this delineative embrace wherever there is grounds to not frame the event of theft from the translational contextualization of passing. When it is theft interpreted from passing, it holds to the proper arraignment, but when the action is not rectified from that context, the event can compound further and result in philosophically irreverent complexity granting of propagated harm. Considering the above explanation, theft is resolved by not only returning what was taken, but also making it so that when what was taken is needed, there is a process to gift and receive whenever it is appropriate.