.png)
The United States of America brought about federal ruling once the country had organized what had been a system of states prior, and federal law, within this narrative, is a law that dictates ruling upon matters that span the full expanse of the country. One gauge of measure is found in an event transpiring in one state moving to another state. Once more than one state is involved, the matter becomes federal. In understanding how it is that one would interpret the event, three fundamental categorizations encompass the possible combinations giving of proper term and context.
There is one categorization that situates its occurrence within the context of a life event being answered with life, death, and/or balance. There is another that encompasses a death event being answered with, again, life, death, and/or balance, and there is a final categorization that orients its framing around a balanced event that is answered with life, death, and/or balance.
The different categorized events that fall in step with that which is described above are wroughtly, raw phrasings for how it is that law, which in this case is to be considered as “the federal law of the United States of America”, is understood. Law itself is defined as ‘fact upholding of truth’. It is a rule that is understood, so as to give frame for knowledges that reside as integral dimensionalities to natural principles. When a law is known, it is to be upheld, as laws come from history, and history comes from time. Federal history is a term that marks an integral period of time in American history when the legal philosophy of the United States grew from the throes of a spirited country. The legal philosophy of the above speaks from a position that is granting of why the governing structure of the country was built. The preamble to the United States' founding document emphasizes further what is conceptually housed within the above as written record. It reads as,
“We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”
To build a union of greater perfection, establish justice, promise domestic peace, provide for common defense, promote general welfare, and secure that which is gifted by blessings rooted in principles of freedom to not only us, of the day, but also those of whom who reside as posterity, the Constitution of the United States of America was ordained and established. The law, then, that dictates part of the frame for that union returns to the definition of ‘fact upholding of truth’. The term ‘truths’, itself, is written as a reiterate in a piece that reigns as accompanying, governing literature titled as “The Declaration of Independence”, and it builds further what is understood within standing, governing United States of America legal philosophy. The ‘truths’ that the quote refers to are found earlier in the document, in its first passage (found below), and as a point of final extraction, they read within the context of a wrought and simple declaration. It reads as follows,
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness…”
Considering the federal branch of legal philosophy, human identity inevitably finds position at the ‘heart’, or seat, of any and all contextual dynamics because of the need to define the implicated human elements in a fitting and appropriate frame. If an instance of death spans several states due to an individual passing away who maintained properties in different states, federal law would mandate either the closing of those properties, the growth of those properties, and/or the maintaining of those properties. In order of the writ found above, the legal response lists as death, life, and balance, and the initial legal event of federal classification classifies under the courting pretext of ‘death’. Seen as a charted instrument of rule, the full legal matrix for entities courting between states as well as full territorial expanses lists as follows,
Moving further with the above delineation, the mission of the United States of America is written within its governing document as,
“When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.”
Returning to the definition of law, then - written out as ‘fact upholding of truth’ - the word ‘human’ (used above) precedes expressions that delineate the ‘truths’ to be termed in the beginning portions of the second passage. The manner in which federal law folds from this governing narrative falls in direct alignment with how it is that the country would be framed within the axes of above interpretation.
Knowing that federal law becomes applicable when two definably different entities interact within an environment that spans, at the very least, two different state regions, the tabled chart above serves as the initial engagement for how it is that the human identities present in both federally courting parties would interact. Blood contracts are the only reason for human identities to interact wherein the legal ‘mathematics’ of the situation pan as the subsequent serial, or relatively general, approach that is utilized, so as to see the proper solution conducted. Humanism is a part of this relational interaction, and as the different elements of the legal equation evolve to compose a network of plausible and palatable design, regardless of how many solutions are possible, the central means of decision inevitably grow to be based in the fundamental, philosophical axes of surgical action that position the mechanics of law in the same analogous verbiage of naturally, holistic, rudimentary exchange. A six-fold pattern, though, of level dynamic aids in making sense of this doctoral understanding that pans across the following listing: general legality; serial legality; medicinal legality; fundamental legality; knowledgeable legality; and thermodynamically sustainable legality.
From a position of direct concern regarding blood, the qualifying legal action would be identifying the proper human identities of the appropriate and relevant entity and then provisioning righthood or rectification as it is to be received. When gifted to the proper elements of the correct and deserving human identities, the legality of any all matters comes to be an act of imparting the proper exchange of life, death, and balance between parties of implicated association. Liken unto what one has in facilitated, courted exchange - as it would be a courting affair - the two entities would partake in gentlemanly and ladylike interaction wherein the whole of the legal matter would be resolved with proper business and account.
Mathematics is fundamentally key for the surgical holism that resides as a natural intrinsincy to the above, and in knowing the aforewritten formula described in previous sections, law comes to be an act of seamless activity by degrees of definably counted and ruling measure. Written out, surgical legality is analogous to fundamental medicinal methodologies with the processes of conduction spanning the aforewritten principled arrangement of the following:
To perform a cut: one moves the energy fueling the problem to natural light and the blood of the relevant entities into a knowledgeable setting.
To perform a stitch: one moves the blood of the problem into a natural light and the energy of the problem into a knowledgeable context.
The natural processes of surgically holistic approach based in the philosophies of these aforewritten disciplined arrangements then come to serve by way of actions geared toward effective and resolutory engagement for law, and all legality, at any given measure.
No comments:
Post a Comment